Merge branch 'main' into spelling
This commit is contained in:
@@ -33,7 +33,3 @@ For example:
|
||||
lazy val myAwesomeAccel = (project in file("generators/myAwesomeAccelFolder"))
|
||||
.dependsOn(rocketchip)
|
||||
.settings(commonSettings)
|
||||
|
||||
lazy val tapeout = conditionalDependsOn(project in file("./tools/barstools/tapeout/"))
|
||||
.dependsOn(myAwesomeAccel)
|
||||
.settings(commonSettings)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ The default standard ``ChipTop`` provides a mimimal, barebones template for ``IO
|
||||
For tapeouts, integrating Analog IP, or other non-standard use cases, Chipyard supports specifying a custom ``ChipTop`` using the ``BuildTop`` key.
|
||||
An example of a custom ChipTop which uses non-standard IOCells is provided in `generators/chipyard/src/main/scala/example/CustomChipTop.scala <https://github.com/ucb-bar/chipyard/blob/main/generators/chipyard/src/main/scala/example/CustomChipTop.scala>`__
|
||||
|
||||
You can also specify a fully custom ChipTop that does not use any RocketChip or Chipyard SoC components. An example of this is provided in `generators/chipyard/src/main/scala/example/EmptyChipTop.scala <https://github.com/ucb-bar/chipyard/blob/main/generators/chipyard/src/main/scala/example/EmptyChipTop.scala>`__. The ``EmptyChipTop`` example can be built with ``make CONFIG=EmptyChipTopConfig TOP=EmptyChipTop``.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
System/DigitalTop
|
||||
-------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ Tools
|
||||
FIRRTL enables digital circuits manipulation between Chisel elaboration and Verilog generation.
|
||||
See :ref:`Tools/FIRRTL:FIRRTL` for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
**Barstools**
|
||||
**Tapeout-Tools (Formerly Barstools)**
|
||||
A collection of common FIRRTL transformations used to manipulate a digital circuit without changing the generator source RTL.
|
||||
See :ref:`Tools/Barstools:Barstools` for more information.
|
||||
See :ref:`Tools/Tapeout-Tools:Tapeout-Tools` for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
**Dsptools**
|
||||
A Chisel library for writing custom signal processing hardware, as well as integrating custom signal processing hardware into an SoC (especially a Rocket-based SoC).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ should look something like this:
|
||||
.. code-block:: scala
|
||||
|
||||
lazy val chipyard = (project in file("generators/chipyard"))
|
||||
.dependsOn(testchipip, rocketchip, boom, hwacha, rocketchip_blocks, rocketchip_inclusive_cache, iocell,
|
||||
.dependsOn(testchipip, rocketchip, boom, hwacha, rocketchip_blocks, rocketchip_inclusive_cache,
|
||||
sha3, dsptools, `rocket-dsp-utils`,
|
||||
gemmini, icenet, tracegen, cva6, nvdla, sodor, ibex, fft_generator,
|
||||
yourproject, // <- added to the middle of the list for simplicity
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,18 +22,18 @@ Where to add transforms
|
||||
|
||||
In Chipyard, the FIRRTL compiler is called multiple times to create a "Top" file that contains the DUT and a "Model" file containing the test harness, which instantiates the DUT.
|
||||
The "Model" file does not contain the DUT's module definition or any of its submodules.
|
||||
This is done by the ``tapeout`` SBT project (located in ``tools/barstools/tapeout``) which calls ``GenerateModelStageMain`` (a function that wraps the multiple FIRRTL compiler calls and extra transforms).
|
||||
This is done by the ``tapeout`` SBT project (located in ``tools/tapeout``) which calls ``GenerateModelStageMain`` (a function that wraps the multiple FIRRTL compiler calls and extra transforms).
|
||||
|
||||
.. literalinclude:: ../../common.mk
|
||||
:language: make
|
||||
:start-after: DOC include start: FirrtlCompiler
|
||||
:end-before: DOC include end: FirrtlCompiler
|
||||
|
||||
If you look inside of the `tools/barstools/tapeout/src/main/scala/transforms/GenerateModelStageMain.scala <https://github.com/ucb-bar/barstools/blob/master/tapeout/src/main/scala/transforms/GenerateModelStageMain.scala>`__ file,
|
||||
If you look inside of the ``tools/tapeout/src/main/scala/transforms/GenerateModelStageMain.scala`` file,
|
||||
you can see that FIRRTL is invoked for "Model". Currently, the FIRRTL compiler is agnostic to the ``TOP`` and ``MODEL`` differentiation,
|
||||
and the user is responsible for providing annotations that will inform the compiler where(``TOP`` vs ``MODEL``) to perform the custom FIRRTL transformations.
|
||||
|
||||
For more information on Barstools, please visit the :ref:`Tools/Barstools:Barstools` section.
|
||||
For more information on the Tapeout sub-project, please visit the :ref:`Tools/Tapeout-Tools:Tapeout-Tools` section.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples of transforms
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -33,19 +33,6 @@ different directory from Chisel (Scala) sources.
|
||||
vsrc/
|
||||
YourFile.v
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to the steps outlined in the previous section on adding a
|
||||
project to the ``build.sbt`` at the top level, it is also necessary to
|
||||
add any projects that contain Verilog IP as dependencies to the
|
||||
``tapeout`` project. This ensures that the Verilog sources are visible
|
||||
to the downstream FIRRTL passes that provide utilities for integrating
|
||||
Verilog files into the build process, which are part of the
|
||||
``tapeout`` package in ``barstools/tapeout``.
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: scala
|
||||
|
||||
lazy val tapeout = conditionalDependsOn(project in file("./tools/barstools/tapeout/"))
|
||||
.dependsOn(chisel_testers, example, yourproject)
|
||||
.settings(commonSettings)
|
||||
|
||||
For this concrete GCD example, we will be using a ``GCDMMIOBlackBox``
|
||||
Verilog module that is defined in the ``chipyard`` project. The Scala
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -50,16 +50,16 @@ This will elaborate the ``RocketConfig`` in the example project.
|
||||
|
||||
.. Note:: The elaboration of ``RocketConfig`` requires about 6.5 GB of main memory. Otherwise the process will fail with ``make: *** [firrtl_temp] Error 137`` which is most likely related to limited resources. Other configurations might require even more main memory.
|
||||
|
||||
An executable called ``simulator-chipyard-RocketConfig`` will be produced.
|
||||
An executable called ``simulator-chipyard.harness-RocketConfig`` will be produced.
|
||||
This executable is a simulator that has been compiled based on the design that was built.
|
||||
You can then use this executable to run any compatible RV64 code.
|
||||
For instance, to run one of the riscv-tools assembly tests.
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: shell
|
||||
|
||||
./simulator-chipyard-RocketConfig $RISCV/riscv64-unknown-elf/share/riscv-tests/isa/rv64ui-p-simple
|
||||
./simulator-chipyard.harness-RocketConfig $RISCV/riscv64-unknown-elf/share/riscv-tests/isa/rv64ui-p-simple
|
||||
|
||||
.. Note:: In a VCS simulator, the simulator name will be ``simv-chipyard-RocketConfig`` instead of ``simulator-chipyard-RocketConfig``.
|
||||
.. Note:: In a VCS simulator, the simulator name will be ``simv-chipyard.harness-RocketConfig`` instead of ``simulator-chipyard.harness-RocketConfig``.
|
||||
|
||||
The makefiles have a ``run-binary`` rule that simplifies running the simulation executable. It adds many of the common command line options for you and redirects the output to a file.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
Barstools
|
||||
Tapeout-Tools
|
||||
===============================
|
||||
|
||||
Barstools is a collection of useful FIRRTL transformations and compilers to help the build process.
|
||||
Tapeout-Tools is a collection of useful FIRRTL transformations and compilers to help the build process.
|
||||
Included in the tools are a MacroCompiler (used to map Chisel memory constructs to vendor SRAMs), FIRRTL transforms (to separate harness and top-level SoC files), and more.
|
||||
|
||||
Mapping technology SRAMs (MacroCompiler)
|
||||
@@ -23,16 +23,16 @@ An external module reference is a FIRRTL construct that enables a design to refe
|
||||
A list of unique SRAM configurations is output to a ``.conf`` file by FIRRTL, which is used to map technology SRAMs.
|
||||
Without this transform, FIRRTL will map all ``SeqMem`` s to flip-flop arrays with equivalent behavior, which may lead to a design that is difficult to route.
|
||||
|
||||
The ``.conf`` file is consumed by a tool called MacroCompiler, which is part of the :ref:`Tools/Barstools:Barstools` scala package.
|
||||
The ``.conf`` file is consumed by a tool called MacroCompiler, which is part of the :ref:`Tools/Tapeout-Tools:Tapeout-Tools` scala package.
|
||||
MacroCompiler is also passed an ``.mdf`` file that describes the available list of technology SRAMs or the capabilities of the SRAM compiler, if one is provided by the foundry.
|
||||
Typically a foundry SRAM compiler will be able to generate a set of different SRAMs collateral based on some requirements on size, aspect ratio, etc. (see :ref:`Tools/Barstools:SRAM MDF Fields`).
|
||||
Typically a foundry SRAM compiler will be able to generate a set of different SRAMs collateral based on some requirements on size, aspect ratio, etc. (see :ref:`Tools/Tapeout-Tools:SRAM MDF Fields`).
|
||||
Using a user-customizable cost function, MacroCompiler will select the SRAMs that are the best fit for each dimensionality in the ``.conf`` file.
|
||||
This may include over provisioning (e.g. using a 64x1024 SRAM for a requested 60x1024, if the latter is not available) or arraying.
|
||||
Arraying can be done in both width and depth, as well as to solve masking constraints.
|
||||
For example, a 128x2048 array could be composed of four 64x1024 arrays, with two macros in parallel to create two 128x1024 virtual SRAMs which are combinationally muxed to add depth.
|
||||
If this macro requires byte-granularity write masking, but no technology SRAMs support masking, then the tool may choose to use thirty-two 8x1024 arrays in a similar configuration.
|
||||
You may wish to create a cache of your available SRAM macros either manually, or via a script. A reference script for creating a JSON of your SRAM macros is in the `asap7 technology library folder <https://github.com/ucb-bar/hammer/blob/8fd1486499b875d56f09b060f03a62775f0a6aa7/src/hammer-vlsi/technology/asap7/sram-cache-gen.py>`__.
|
||||
For information on writing ``.mdf`` files, look at `MDF on github <https://github.com/ucb-bar/plsi-mdf>`__ and a brief description in :ref:`Tools/Barstools:SRAM MDF Fields` section.
|
||||
For information on writing ``.mdf`` files, look at `MDF on github <https://github.com/ucb-bar/plsi-mdf>`__ and a brief description in :ref:`Tools/Tapeout-Tools:SRAM MDF Fields` section.
|
||||
|
||||
The output of MacroCompiler is a Verilog file containing modules that wrap the technology SRAMs into the specified interface names from the ``.conf``.
|
||||
If the technology supports an SRAM compiler, then MacroCompiler will also emit HammerIR that can be passed to Hammer to run the compiler itself and generate design collateral.
|
||||
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ This is necessary to facilitate post-synthesis and post-place-and-route simulati
|
||||
Simulations, after your design goes through a VLSI flow, will use the verilog netlist generated from the flow and will need an untouched test harness to drive it.
|
||||
Separating these components into separate files makes this straightforward.
|
||||
Without the separation the file that included the test harness would also redefine the DUT which is often disallowed in simulation tools.
|
||||
To do this, there is a FIRRTL ``App`` in :ref:`Tools/Barstools:Barstools` called ``GenerateTopAndHarness``, which runs the appropriate transforms to elaborate the modules separately.
|
||||
To do this, there is a FIRRTL ``App`` in :ref:`Tools/Tapeout-Tools:Tapeout-Tools` called ``GenerateTopAndHarness``, which runs the appropriate transforms to elaborate the modules separately.
|
||||
This also renames modules in the test harness so that any modules that are instantiated in both the test harness and the chip are uniquified.
|
||||
|
||||
.. Note:: For VLSI projects, this ``App`` is run instead of the normal FIRRTL ``App`` to elaborate Verilog.
|
||||
@@ -133,5 +133,5 @@ This, unfortunately, breaks the process-agnostic RTL abstraction, so it is recom
|
||||
The simplest way to do this is to have a config fragment that when included updates instantiates the IO cells and connects them in the test harness.
|
||||
When simulating chip-specific designs, it is important to include the IO cells.
|
||||
The IO cell behavioral models will often assert if they are connected incorrectly, which is a useful runtime check.
|
||||
They also keep the IO interface at the chip and test harness boundary (see :ref:`Tools/Barstools:Separating the Top module from the TestHarness module`) consistent after synthesis and place-and-route,
|
||||
They also keep the IO interface at the chip and test harness boundary (see :ref:`Tools/Tapeout-Tools:Separating the Top module from the TestHarness module`) consistent after synthesis and place-and-route,
|
||||
which allows the RTL simulation test harness to be reused.
|
||||
@@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ The following pages will introduce them, and how we can use them in order to gen
|
||||
FIRRTL
|
||||
Treadle
|
||||
Dsptools
|
||||
Barstools
|
||||
Tapeout-Tools
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ We will do so by calling ``make buildfile`` with appropriate Chipyard configurat
|
||||
As in the rest of the Chipyard flows, we specify our SoC configuration using the ``CONFIG`` make variable.
|
||||
However, unlike the rest of the Chipyard flows, in the case of physical design we might be interested in working in a hierarchical fashion and therefore we would like to work on a single module.
|
||||
Therefore, we can also specify a ``VLSI_TOP`` make variable with the same of a specific Verilog module (which should also match the name of the equivalent Chisel module) which we would like to work on.
|
||||
The makefile will automatically call tools such as Barstools and the MacroCompiler (:ref:`Tools/Barstools:barstools`) in order to make the generated Verilog more VLSI friendly.
|
||||
The makefile will automatically call tools such as Tapeout-Tools and the MacroCompiler (:ref:`Tools/Tapeout-Tools:Tapeout-Tools`) in order to make the generated Verilog more VLSI friendly.
|
||||
By default, the MacroCompiler will attempt to map memories into the SRAM options within the Hammer technology plugin. However, if you are working with a new process technology and prefer to work with flip-flop arrays, you can configure the MacroCompiler using the ``TOP_MACROCOMPILER_MODE`` make variable. For example, if your technology plugin does not have an SRAM compiler ready, you can use the ``TOP_MACROCOMPILER_MODE='--mode synflops'`` option (Note that synthesizing a design with only flipflops is very slow and will often may not meet constraints).
|
||||
|
||||
We call the ``make buildfile`` command while also specifying the name of the process technology we are working with (same ``tech_name`` for the configuration files and plugin name) and the configuration files we created. Note, in the ASAP7 tutorial ((:ref:`tutorial`)) these configuration files are merged into a single file called ``example-asap7.yml``.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Transforming the RTL
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Building a chip requires specializing the generic verilog emitted by FIRRTL to adhere to the constraints imposed by the technology used for fabrication.
|
||||
This includes mapping Chisel memories to available technology macros such as SRAMs, mapping the input and output of your chip to connect to technology IO cells, see :ref:`Tools/Barstools:Barstools`.
|
||||
This includes mapping Chisel memories to available technology macros such as SRAMs, mapping the input and output of your chip to connect to technology IO cells, see :ref:`Tools/Tapeout-Tools:Tapeout-tools`.
|
||||
In addition to these required transformations, it may also be beneficial to transform the RTL to make it more amenable to hierarchical physical design easier.
|
||||
This often includes modifying the logical hierarchy to match the physical hierarchy through grouping components together or flattening components into a single larger module.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user