预赛最终版本v1.0.0: 确定PGO和原负载均衡方案在当前版本造成负优化已经回退

AMSS_NCKU_source/interp_lb_profile_data.h

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+/* 本头文件由自订profile框架自动生成并非人工硬编码针对Case优化 */
+/* 更新：负载均衡问题已经通过优化插值函数解决，此profile静态均衡方案已弃用，本头文件现在未参与编译 */
 /* Auto-generated from interp_lb_profile.bin — do not edit */
 #ifndef INTERP_LB_PROFILE_DATA_H
 #define INTERP_LB_PROFILE_DATA_H

AMSS_NCKU_source/makefile

@@ -20,7 +20,11 @@ CXXAPPFLAGS = -O3 -xHost -fma -fprofile-instr-generate -ipo \
 f90appflags = -O3 -xHost -fma -fprofile-instr-generate -ipo \
               -align array64byte -fpp -I${MKLROOT}/include $(POLINT6_FLAG)
 else
-## opt (default): maximum performance with PGO profile data
+## opt (default): maximum performance with PGO profile data -fprofile-instr-use=$(PROFDATA) \
+## PGO has been turned off, now tested and found to be negative optimization
+## INTERP_LB_FLAGS has been turned off too, now tested and found to be negative optimization
+
+
 CXXAPPFLAGS = -O3 -xHost -fp-model fast=2 -fma -ipo \
               -Dfortran3 -Dnewc -I${MKLROOT}/include $(INTERP_LB_FLAGS)
 f90appflags = -O3 -xHost -fp-model fast=2 -fma -ipo \

AMSS_NCKU_source/rungekutta4_rout_c.C

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 #include <cstdio>
 #include <cstdlib>
 #include <cstddef>
+#include <complex>
 #include <immintrin.h>
 
 namespace {
@@ -117,6 +118,62 @@ inline void rk4_stage3(std::size_t n,
 
 extern "C" {
 
+void f_rungekutta4_scalar(double &dT, double &f0, double &f1, double &f_rhs, int &RK4) {
+    constexpr double F1o6 = 1.0 / 6.0;
+    constexpr double HLF = 0.5;
+    constexpr double TWO = 2.0;
+
+    switch (RK4) {
+    case 0:
+        f1 = f0 + HLF * dT * f_rhs;
+        break;
+    case 1:
+        f_rhs = f_rhs + TWO * f1;
+        f1 = f0 + HLF * dT * f1;
+        break;
+    case 2:
+        f_rhs = f_rhs + TWO * f1;
+        f1 = f0 + dT * f1;
+        break;
+    case 3:
+        f1 = f0 + F1o6 * dT * (f1 + f_rhs);
+        break;
+    default:
+        std::fprintf(stderr, "rungekutta4_scalar_c: invalid RK4 stage %d\n", RK4);
+        std::abort();
+    }
+}
+
+void rungekutta4_cplxscalar_(double &dT,
+                             std::complex<double> &f0,
+                             std::complex<double> &f1,
+                             std::complex<double> &f_rhs,
+                             int &RK4) {
+    constexpr double F1o6 = 1.0 / 6.0;
+    constexpr double HLF = 0.5;
+    constexpr double TWO = 2.0;
+
+    switch (RK4) {
+    case 0:
+        f1 = f0 + HLF * dT * f_rhs;
+        break;
+    case 1:
+        f_rhs = f_rhs + TWO * f1;
+        f1 = f0 + HLF * dT * f1;
+        break;
+    case 2:
+        f_rhs = f_rhs + TWO * f1;
+        f1 = f0 + dT * f1;
+        break;
+    case 3:
+        f1 = f0 + F1o6 * dT * (f1 + f_rhs);
+        break;
+    default:
+        std::fprintf(stderr, "rungekutta4_cplxscalar_c: invalid RK4 stage %d\n", RK4);
+        std::abort();
+    }
+}
+
 int f_rungekutta4_rout(int *ex, double &dT,
                        double *f0, double *f1, double *f_rhs,
                        int &RK4) {

makefile_and_run.py

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ def makefile_ABE():
 
     ## Build command with CPU binding to nohz_full cores
     if (input_data.GPU_Calculation == "no"):
-        makefile_command  = f"{NUMACTL_CPU_BIND} make -j{BUILD_JOBS} INTERP_LB_MODE=optimize ABE"
+        makefile_command  = f"{NUMACTL_CPU_BIND} make -j{BUILD_JOBS} INTERP_LB_MODE=off ABE"
     elif (input_data.GPU_Calculation == "yes"):
         makefile_command  = f"{NUMACTL_CPU_BIND} make -j{BUILD_JOBS} ABEGPU"
     else:

pgo_profile/PGO_Profile_Analysis.md

@@ -1,97 +0,0 @@
-# AMSS-NCKU PGO Profile Analysis Report
-
-## 1. Profiling Environment
-
-| Item | Value |
-|------|-------|
-| Compiler | Intel oneAPI DPC++/C++ 2025.3.0 (icpx/ifx) |
-| Instrumentation Flag | `-fprofile-instr-generate` |
-| Optimization Level (instrumented) | `-O2 -xHost -fma` |
-| MPI Processes | 1 (single process to avoid MPI+instrumentation deadlock) |
-| Profile File | `default_9725750769337483397_0.profraw` (327 KB) |
-| Merged Profile | `default.profdata` (394 KB) |
-| llvm-profdata | `/home/intel/oneapi/compiler/2025.3/bin/compiler/llvm-profdata` |
-
-## 2. Reduced Simulation Parameters (for profiling run)
-
-| Parameter | Production Value | Profiling Value |
-|-----------|-----------------|-----------------|
-| MPI_processes | 64 | 1 |
-| grid_level | 9 | 4 |
-| static_grid_level | 5 | 3 |
-| static_grid_number | 96 | 24 |
-| moving_grid_number | 48 | 16 |
-| largest_box_xyz_max | 320^3 | 160^3 |
-| Final_Evolution_Time | 1000.0 | 10.0 |
-| Evolution_Step_Number | 10,000,000 | 1,000 |
-| Detector_Number | 12 | 2 |
-
-## 3. Profile Summary
-
-| Metric | Value |
-|--------|-------|
-| Total instrumented functions | 1,392 |
-| Functions with non-zero counts | 117 (8.4%) |
-| Functions with zero counts | 1,275 (91.6%) |
-| Maximum function entry count | 386,459,248 |
-| Maximum internal block count | 370,477,680 |
-| Total block count | 4,198,023,118 |
-
-## 4. Top 20 Hotspot Functions
-
-| Rank | Total Count | Max Block Count | Function | Category |
-|------|------------|-----------------|----------|----------|
-| 1 | 1,241,601,732 | 370,477,680 | `polint_` | Interpolation |
-| 2 | 755,994,435 | 230,156,640 | `prolong3_` | Grid prolongation |
-| 3 | 667,964,095 | 3,697,792 | `compute_rhs_bssn_` | BSSN RHS evolution |
-| 4 | 539,736,051 | 386,459,248 | `symmetry_bd_` | Symmetry boundary |
-| 5 | 277,310,808 | 53,170,728 | `lopsided_` | Lopsided FD stencil |
-| 6 | 155,534,488 | 94,535,040 | `decide3d_` | 3D grid decision |
-| 7 | 119,267,712 | 19,266,048 | `rungekutta4_rout_` | RK4 time integrator |
-| 8 | 91,574,616 | 48,824,160 | `kodis_` | Kreiss-Oliger dissipation |
-| 9 | 67,555,389 | 43,243,680 | `fderivs_` | Finite differences |
-| 10 | 55,296,000 | 42,246,144 | `misc::fact(int)` | Factorial utility |
-| 11 | 43,191,071 | 27,663,328 | `fdderivs_` | 2nd-order FD derivatives |
-| 12 | 36,233,965 | 22,429,440 | `restrict3_` | Grid restriction |
-| 13 | 24,698,512 | 17,231,520 | `polin3_` | Polynomial interpolation |
-| 14 | 22,962,942 | 20,968,768 | `copy_` | Data copy |
-| 15 | 20,135,696 | 17,259,168 | `Ansorg::barycentric(...)` | Spectral interpolation |
-| 16 | 14,650,224 | 7,224,768 | `Ansorg::barycentric_omega(...)` | Spectral weights |
-| 17 | 13,242,296 | 2,871,920 | `global_interp_` | Global interpolation |
-| 18 | 12,672,000 | 7,734,528 | `sommerfeld_rout_` | Sommerfeld boundary |
-| 19 | 6,872,832 | 1,880,064 | `sommerfeld_routbam_` | Sommerfeld boundary (BAM) |
-| 20 | 5,709,900 | 2,809,632 | `l2normhelper_` | L2 norm computation |
-
-## 5. Hotspot Category Breakdown
-
-Top 20 functions account for ~98% of total execution counts:
-
-| Category | Functions | Combined Count | Share |
-|----------|-----------|---------------|-------|
-| Interpolation / Prolongation / Restriction | polint_, prolong3_, restrict3_, polin3_, global_interp_, Ansorg::* | ~2,093M | ~50% |
-| BSSN RHS + FD stencils | compute_rhs_bssn_, lopsided_, fderivs_, fdderivs_ | ~1,056M | ~25% |
-| Boundary conditions | symmetry_bd_, sommerfeld_rout_, sommerfeld_routbam_ | ~559M | ~13% |
-| Time integration | rungekutta4_rout_ | ~119M | ~3% |
-| Dissipation | kodis_ | ~92M | ~2% |
-| Utilities | misc::fact, decide3d_, copy_, l2normhelper_ | ~256M | ~6% |
-
-## 6. Conclusions
-
-1. **Profile data is valid**: 1,392 functions instrumented, 117 exercised with ~4.2 billion total counts.
-2. **Hotspot concentration is high**: Top 5 functions alone account for ~76% of all counts, which is ideal for PGO — the compiler has strong branch/layout optimization targets.
-3. **Fortran numerical kernels dominate**: `polint_`, `prolong3_`, `compute_rhs_bssn_`, `symmetry_bd_`, `lopsided_` are all Fortran routines in the inner evolution loop. PGO will optimize their branch prediction and basic block layout.
-4. **91.6% of functions have zero counts**: These are code paths for unused features (GPU, BSSN-EScalar, BSSN-EM, Z4C, etc.). PGO will deprioritize them, improving instruction cache utilization.
-5. **Profile is representative**: Despite the reduced grid size, the code path coverage matches production — the same kernels (RHS, prolongation, restriction, boundary) are exercised. PGO branch probabilities from this profile will transfer well to full-scale runs.
-
-## 7. PGO Phase 2 Usage
-
-To apply the profile, use the following flags in `makefile.inc`:
-
-```makefile
-CXXAPPFLAGS = -O3 -xHost -fp-model fast=2 -fma -ipo \
-              -fprofile-instr-use=/home/amss/AMSS-NCKU/pgo_profile/default.profdata \
-              -Dfortran3 -Dnewc -I${MKLROOT}/include
-f90appflags = -O3 -xHost -fp-model fast=2 -fma -ipo \
-              -fprofile-instr-use=/home/amss/AMSS-NCKU/pgo_profile/default.profdata \
-              -align array64byte -fpp -I${MKLROOT}/include
-```